>Romance Versus Sensationalism

>WTF???

I’ve always liked Oprah and her show. I think she’s done great things to advance the awareness of numerous social issues, specifically with an eye toward women. She’s also done a great deal when it comes to educating her viewers in cultural ways. In particular, getting them to read. Focusing on “literary” works has been a really unique approach given her audience (people who watch TV tend to read less according to statistics – don’t go there Natalie! LOL). I think getting people to read is fantastic and my hat’s off to Oprah for that initiative. With all that in mind, I’ve still always been a little perturbed that she has yet to select a romance for her book club. Not even Diana Gabaldon or Nora Roberts have managed to get their foot in the door with Oprah.

So here I am, perturbed that she’s not had a romance in her Book Club selections, and then I read a small blurb that rocks my faith in the woman. She’s actually hosting a Goldman-Brown showdown on her show with regard to OJ’s controversial book, If I Did It. WTF!?!?!

What is the woman thinking? The title alone is sickening, but in hosting this showdown, it gives the book more validity because of Oprah’s stature and the size of her audience.

Censorship

Don’t misunderstand me, please. I have no objections to the book being published. I don’t condone censorship, but I sure as hell won’t buy the book. And even if the man were to profit, I’m not sure I could say it shouldn’t be published. It would be difficult for me to stomach, but then it was difficult to stomach Nazi skinheads walking through the Jewish neighborhood in Skokie, IL too, but with any real freedom comes dark-sided things. It’s a price we pay. Despite what my personal feelings are, Simpson was acquitted by a jury. With an eye toward censorship, I don’t think prohibiting the book’s publication is in the best interest of keeping the written word free. Let the people talk by not buying it.

But I’m not talking about publication here, I’m talking about publicity. I’ve really got to ask myself, what the hell was Oprah thinking to host a show where OJ’s book is going to get top billing? If it’s the man’s confession, then seeing it in print, might actually convince people who believe in his innocence to change their minds. Not that it would change one anything—two people were brutally murdered and are dead, while two children are motherless. And if he really is guilty, he’s walking around free. So nothing changes with the release or non-release of this book.

From Maya to OJ

What bothers me the most is Oprah’s decision to give a controversial book like this even more exposure, YET she’s never spotlighted a romance book and how romance empowers women to not sit back and take any crap. Empowerment, something Oprah herself touts on a regular basis on her show. How does doing a show about the OJ book empower women—anyone? How is such a show a good thing? The only thing I can see it being good for is ratings, because there are, God Forbid, people out there with a much deeper sense of morbid fascination than me who’ll watch. To say I’m disappointed is an understatement. From Maya Angelou to OJ’s book that’s a low point if you ask me.

Monica

This entry was posted in Ethics, Publishing, Selling Books by Monica Burns. Bookmark the permalink.

About Monica Burns

A bestselling author of erotic romance, Monica Burns penned her first short romance story at the age of nine when she selected the pseudonym she uses today. From the days when she hid her stories from her sisters to her first completed full-length manuscript, she always believed in her dream despite rejections and setbacks. A workaholic wife and mother, Monica believes it’s possible for the good guy to win if they work hard enough.

One thought on “>Romance Versus Sensationalism

  1. >It’s so nice for me to have found this blog of yours, it’s so interesting. I sure hope and wish that you take courage enough to pay me a visit in my PALAVROSSAVRVS REX!, and plus get some surprise. My blog is also so cool! Don’t think for a minute that my invitation is spam and I’m a spammer. I’m only searching for a public that may like or love what I write.

    Feel free off course to comment as you wish and remember: don’t take it wrong, don’t think that this visitation I make is a matter of more audiences for my own blogg. No. It’s a matter of making universal, realy universal, all this question of bloggs, all the essential causes that bring us all together by visiting and loving one another.

    You must not feel obliged to come and visit me. An invitation is not an intimation. Also know that if you click on one of my ads I’m promised to earn a couple of cents for that: I would feel happy and rewarded (because I realy need it!!!) if you did click it, but once again you’re totaly free to do what ever you want. I, for instance, choose immediatly to click on one of your ads, in case you have them. To do so or not, that’s the whole beauty of it all, however, blogocitizens must unite also by clicking-helping eachother when we know cybermegacorporations profit from our own selfishness regarding to that simple click.

    About this I must say, by my own experience, that no one realy cares (maybe a few) about this apeal I make, still I believe in my Work and Dreams and thus I’ll keep on apealing and searching so strong is my will.

    I think it’s to UNITE MANKIND that we became bloggers! Don’t see language as an obstacle but as a challenge (though you can use the translater BabelFish at the bottom of my page!) and think for a minute if I and the rest of the world are not expecting something like a broad cumplicity. Remenber that pictures talk also. Open your heart and come along!!!!!